Supabase vs Appwrite
Open-source BaaS head-to-head — PostgreSQL-native vs multi-database
Quick Recommendation
Supabase
Best for SQL BackendsChoose if you need:
- ✓You want PostgreSQL with full SQL, extensions like pgvector, and PostGIS
- ✓You need a mature managed cloud with predictable pricing and spend cap
- ✓Your team values broad ecosystem support and third-party integrations
Appwrite
Best for Self-HostedChoose if you need:
- ✓You want a fully self-hosted backend with zero cloud costs
- ✓You need 30+ built-in auth methods including anonymous and magic URL
- ✓You want built-in messaging (SMS, email, push) without third-party integrations
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Supabase | Appwrite |
|---|---|---|
| Database | PostgreSQL with full SQL, joins, views, 60+ extensions | MariaDB-backed document database with collections |
| Cloud Pricing | Free (500 MB, pauses after 7 days); Pro $25/mo | Free (unlimited, never pauses); Pro $25/mo/project |
| Self-Hosting | Docker Compose; complex to maintain at scale | Single Docker command; purpose-built for self-hosting |
| Authentication | Email, OAuth, magic link, phone OTP; 50K MAUs free | 30+ methods; all free on self-hosted |
| Real-Time | Postgres CDC-based subscriptions | WebSocket real-time events; unlimited on all plans |
| Storage | S3-compatible; 1 GB free; image transforms via CDN | Built-in with encryption, transforms, and antivirus |
| Built-In Messaging | Not included; requires third-party services | Native SMS, email, and push notifications |
Our Verdict
Supabase is better if your backend relies on relational queries, PostgreSQL extensions, or you want a mature managed cloud. Appwrite shines when self-hosting is a priority, you need built-in messaging, or your team prefers a document-oriented data model.
Frequently Asked Questions
Need help choosing between Supabase and Appwrite?
Our engineers have production experience with both tools. We can help you make the right choice based on your specific requirements, timeline, and budget.